EN

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Radeon 660M

VS

Performance score

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) · shared with RAM
3.43 +18%
Radeon 660M · shared with RAM
2.90
Radeon 780M Radeon 8060S

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) is 18% faster than Radeon 660M by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Radeon 660M
130

faster than 12% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)Radeon 660M
Score (0–100) 3.43 2.9
Ranking position 248 258
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Type Integrated Integrated
Architecture Xe (Alchemist) RDNA 2

Specifications

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)Radeon 660M
Shader cores 512 384
Boost clock 1850–2050 MHz 1800–1900 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 2 1.46
Hardware ray tracing yes yes
Upscaling no data FSR

Video memory

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)Radeon 660M
VRAM shared with RAM shared with RAM
Memory type DDR5 / LPDDR5X LPDDR5 / DDR5

Pros and cons

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)

  • 18% higher overall score

Radeon 660M

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores):

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon 660M:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) / Radeon 660M.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.