Arc A350M vs Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores): graphics card comparison

Performance score

Arc A350M · 4 GB GDDR6, 25–35 W

3.52 +3%

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) · shared with RAM

3.43

Radeon 780M GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

By our estimate, Arc A350M beats Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) by 3%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc A350M

393

faster than 11% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

	Arc A350M	Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
Score (0–100)	3.52	3.43
Ranking position	246	248
Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Type	Laptop	Integrated
Architecture	Xe (Alchemist)	Xe (Alchemist)

Specifications

	Arc A350M	Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
Shader cores	768	512
Boost clock	1150 MHz	1850–2050 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated)	1.77	2
Hardware ray tracing	yes	yes

Video memory

	Arc A350M	Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
VRAM	4 GB	shared with RAM
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR5 / LPDDR5X
Memory bus	64 bit	no data

Power and connection

	Arc A350M	Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
Board power	25–35 W	no data

Pros and cons

Arc A350M

no notable advantages

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)

no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A350M / Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores).

No comments yet — be the first.