FPSVersusApple A18 Pro GPU 5-core vs Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
Performance score
By our estimate, Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) beats Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core by 3%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 3.34 | 3.43 |
| Ranking position | 249 | 248 |
| Manufacturer | Apple | Intel |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Apple | Xe (Alchemist) |
Specifications
| Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 640 | 512 |
| Boost clock | 1450 MHz | 1850–2050 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 1.86 | 2 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | yes |
Video memory
| Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | unified | DDR5 / LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core
- no notable advantages
Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
- Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core vs IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake)
- Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core vs Radeon840M
- Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core vs GeForce GTX470
- Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core vs GeForce GTX560
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Qualcomm AdrenoX1-85
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Intel ArcA350M
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake)
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Radeon HD6870
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core / Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores).
No comments yet — be the first.