FPSVersusIntel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)
Performance score
By our estimate, Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) beats Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) by 4%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 3.43 | 3.31 |
| Ranking position | 248 | 250 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | Xe3 |
Specifications
| Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 512 | 256 |
| Boost clock | 1850–2050 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 2 | 1.13 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | yes |
Video memory
| Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | DDR5 / LPDDR5X | DDR5 / LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
- 4% higher overall score
Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Qualcomm AdrenoX1-85
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Intel ArcA350M
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Radeon HD6870
- IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake) vs Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core
- IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake) vs Radeon840M
- IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake) vs GeForce GTX470
- IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake) vs GeForce GTX560
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) / Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake).
No comments yet — be the first.