FPSVersusAdreno X1-85 vs Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
Performance score
Adreno X1-85 and Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Adreno X1-85 | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 3.46 | 3.43 |
| Ranking position | 247 | 248 |
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm | Intel |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Adreno | Xe (Alchemist) |
Specifications
| Adreno X1-85 | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 1536 | 512 |
| Boost clock | 1250 MHz | 1850–2050 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 3.84 | 2 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | yes |
Video memory
| Adreno X1-85 | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 / LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Adreno X1-85
- no notable advantages
Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
- Qualcomm AdrenoX1-85 vs Intel ArcA350M
- Qualcomm AdrenoX1-85 vs Radeon HD6870
- Qualcomm AdrenoX1-85 vs Radeon R7360
- Qualcomm AdrenoX1-85 vs Intel IrisXe Graphics
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Intel ArcA350M
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake)
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Radeon HD6870
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Adreno X1-85 / Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores).
No comments yet — be the first.