Arc A350M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics: graphics card comparison

Performance score

Arc A350M · 4 GB GDDR6, 25–35 W

3.52

Intel Iris Xe Graphics · shared with RAM

3.58

Radeon 780M GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

Arc A350M and Intel Iris Xe Graphics are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc A350M

393

faster than 11% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

	Arc A350M	Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Score (0–100)	3.52	3.58
Ranking position	246	243
Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Type	Laptop	Integrated
Architecture	Xe (Alchemist)	Xe-LP

Specifications

	Arc A350M	Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Shader cores	768	768
Boost clock	1150 MHz	1100–1450 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated)	1.77	2.15
Hardware ray tracing	yes	no

Video memory

	Arc A350M	Intel Iris Xe Graphics
VRAM	4 GB	shared with RAM
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR4 / DDR5 / LPDDR5
Memory bus	64 bit	no data

Power and connection

	Arc A350M	Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Board power	25–35 W	no data

Pros and cons

Arc A350M

has hardware ray tracing

Intel Iris Xe Graphics

no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A350M / Intel Iris Xe Graphics.

No comments yet — be the first.