FPSVersusIntel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Performance score
Intel Iris Xe Graphics is 4% faster than Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 3.43 | 3.58 |
| Ranking position | 248 | 243 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | Xe-LP |
Specifications
| Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 512 | 768 |
| Boost clock | 1850–2050 MHz | 1100–1450 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 2 | 2.15 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | DDR5 / LPDDR5X | DDR4 / DDR5 / LPDDR5 |
Pros and cons
Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
- has hardware ray tracing
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
- 4% higher overall score
Other comparisons
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Qualcomm AdrenoX1-85
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Intel ArcA350M
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core
- IntelGraphics (4 Xe-cores) vs IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake)
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Radeon HD6870
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Radeon R7360
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs GeForce GTX560 Ti
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Intel ArcA350M
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) / Intel Iris Xe Graphics.
No comments yet — be the first.