EN

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake) vs Radeon R9 280X

VS

Performance score

6.62
Radeon R9 280X 2013 · 3 GB GDDR5, 250 W
7.42 +12%

Radeon R9 280X is 12% faster than Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake) by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Overview

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)Radeon R9 280X
Score (0–100) 6.62 7.42
Ranking position 194 184
Power efficiency (0–100) no data 14.23
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Type Integrated Desktop
Architecture Xe (Alchemist) GCN
Release date no data 2013-10-08

Specifications

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)Radeon R9 280X
Shader cores 1024 2048
Base clock no data 850 MHz
Boost clock 2200–2350 MHz 1000 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 4.81 4.1
AI TOPS (as stated by the maker) 19 no data
Hardware ray tracing yes no
Upscaling XeSS no data

Video memory

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)Radeon R9 280X
VRAM shared with RAM 3 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X / DDR5 GDDR5
Memory bus no data 384 bit
Memory bandwidth no data 288 GB/s

Power and connection

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)Radeon R9 280X
Board power no data 250 W

Pros and cons

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)

  • has hardware ray tracing

Radeon R9 280X

  • 12% higher overall score

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake):

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon R9 280X:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake) / Radeon R9 280X.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.