Arc 140T vs Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake): graphics card comparison

Performance score

Arc 140T · shared with RAM

6.62

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake) · shared with RAM

6.62

Radeon 660M Radeon 890M Radeon 8060S

Arc 140T and Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake) are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc 140T

804

faster than 43% of tested · runs: 15

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

	Arc 140T	Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)
Score (0–100)	6.62	6.62
Ranking position	193	194
Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Type	Integrated	Integrated
Architecture	Xe (Alchemist)	Xe (Alchemist)

Specifications

	Arc 140T	Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)
Shader cores	1024	1024
Boost clock	2250–2350 MHz	2200–2350 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated)	4.81	4.81
AI TOPS (as stated by the maker)	77	19
Hardware ray tracing	yes	yes
Upscaling	XeSS	XeSS

Video memory

	Arc 140T	Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)
VRAM	shared with RAM	shared with RAM
Memory type	LPDDR5X / DDR5	LPDDR5X / DDR5

Pros and cons

Arc 140T

no notable advantages

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)

no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc 140T / Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake).

No comments yet — be the first.