FPSVersusArc 140T vs Arc A530M
Performance score
Arc 140T and Arc A530M are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Arc 140T | Arc A530M | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 6.62 | 6.47 |
| Ranking position | 193 | 196 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Type | Integrated | Laptop |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | Xe (Alchemist) |
Specifications
| Arc 140T | Arc A530M | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 1024 | 1536 |
| Boost clock | 2250–2350 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 4.81 | 3.99 |
| AI TOPS (as stated by the maker) | 77 | no data |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | yes |
| Upscaling | XeSS | no data |
Video memory
| Arc 140T | Arc A530M | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X / DDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | no data | 128 bit |
Power and connection
| Arc 140T | Arc A530M | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | no data | 65–95 W |
Pros and cons
Arc 140T
- no notable advantages
Arc A530M
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc 140T / Arc A530M.
No comments yet — be the first.