EN

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) vs Radeon 840M

VS

Performance score

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) · shared with RAM
3.43 +5%
Radeon 840M · shared with RAM
3.27

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) is 5% faster than Radeon 840M by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 10% of tested · runs: 6

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)Radeon 840M
Score (0–100) 3.43 3.27
Ranking position 248 251
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Type Integrated Integrated
Architecture Xe (Alchemist) RDNA 3.5

Specifications

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)Radeon 840M
Shader cores 512 256
Boost clock 1850–2050 MHz 2900 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 2 1.48
Hardware ray tracing yes yes

Video memory

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)Radeon 840M
VRAM shared with RAM shared with RAM
Memory type DDR5 / LPDDR5X DDR5 / LPDDR5X

Pros and cons

Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)

  • 5% higher overall score

Radeon 840M

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores):

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon 840M:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) / Radeon 840M.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.