FPSVersusArc A350M vs Radeon R7 260X
Performance score
By our estimate, Radeon R7 260X beats Arc A350M by 13%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
GPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Arc A350M | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 3.52 | 3.99 |
| Ranking position | 246 | 237 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | GCN |
Specifications
| Arc A350M | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 768 | 896 |
| Boost clock | 1150 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 1.77 | 1.79 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Arc A350M | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus | 64 bit | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 104 GB/s |
Power and connection
| Arc A350M | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | 25–35 W | no data |
Pros and cons
Arc A350M
- has hardware ray tracing
Radeon R7 260X
- 13% higher overall score
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A350M / Radeon R7 260X.
No comments yet — be the first.