FPSVersusAdreno X2-90 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Performance score
Adreno X2-90 is 29% faster than Intel Iris Xe Graphics by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Adreno X2-90 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 4.63 | 3.58 |
| Ranking position | 227 | 243 |
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm | Intel |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Adreno | Xe-LP |
Specifications
| Adreno X2-90 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 1536 | 768 |
| Boost clock | 1850 MHz | 1100–1450 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 5.68 | 2.15 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Adreno X2-90 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | DDR4 / DDR5 / LPDDR5 |
Pros and cons
Adreno X2-90
- 29% higher overall score
- has hardware ray tracing
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
- Qualcomm AdrenoX2-90 vs Apple GPUM2 GPU 8-core
- Qualcomm AdrenoX2-90 vs Apple GPUM3 GPU 8-core
- Qualcomm AdrenoX2-90 vs Intel IrisXe MAX
- Qualcomm AdrenoX2-90 vs Radeon RX460
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Radeon HD6870
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Radeon R7360
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs GeForce GTX560 Ti
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Intel ArcA350M
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Adreno X2-90 / Intel Iris Xe Graphics.
No comments yet — be the first.