FPSVersusIntel Graphics (Panther Lake) vs Radeon R9 280
Performance score
Radeon 660M
Radeon RX 580
Radeon 8060S
GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 5060
Radeon RX 9070 XT
GeForce RTX 4090
By our estimate, Radeon R9 280 beats Intel Graphics (Panther Lake) by 10%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Intel Graphics (Panther Lake) | Radeon R9 280 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 5.76 | 6.36 |
| Ranking position | 206 | 197 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Type | Integrated | Desktop |
| Architecture | Xe3 | GCN |
Specifications
| Intel Graphics (Panther Lake) | Radeon R9 280 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 512 | 1792 |
| Boost clock | 2300 MHz | 933 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 2.36 | 3.34 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Intel Graphics (Panther Lake) | Radeon R9 280 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | 3 GB |
| Memory type | DDR5 / LPDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 240 GB/s |
Pros and cons
Intel Graphics (Panther Lake)
- has hardware ray tracing
Radeon R9 280
- 10% higher overall score
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Graphics (Panther Lake) / Radeon R9 280.
No comments yet — be the first.