FPSVersusExynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G6
Performance score
Exynos 2600 is 3% faster than Google Tensor G6 by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor G6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 34.81 | 33.84 |
| Ranking position | 8 | 9 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | |
| Architecture | Armv9.3-A | Armv9.3-A |
| Release date | Q1 2026 | Q3 2026 |
Specifications
| Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor G6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 7 |
| Threads | 10 | 7 |
| Core layout | 1× C1-Ultra 3.8 GHz + 3× C1-Pro 3.25 GHz + 6× C1-Pro 2.75 GHz | 1× C1-Ultra 4.1 GHz + 4× C1-Pro 3.4 GHz + 2× C1-Pro 2.65 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Process node | Samsung 2 нм GAA | TSMC 3 нм |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Imagination PowerVR |
Memory
| Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor G6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Exynos 2600
- more cores: 10 vs 7
- more threads: 10 vs 7
Google Tensor G6
- 8% faster single core
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Exynos 2600 / Google Tensor G6.
No comments yet — be the first.