FPSVersusIntel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Performance score
By our estimate, Intel Iris Xe Graphics beats Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) by 8%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 3.31 | 3.58 |
| Ranking position | 250 | 243 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Xe3 | Xe-LP |
Specifications
| Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 256 | 768 |
| Boost clock | 2200 MHz | 1100–1450 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 1.13 | 2.15 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | DDR5 / LPDDR5X | DDR4 / DDR5 / LPDDR5 |
Pros and cons
Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)
- has hardware ray tracing
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
- 8% higher overall score
Other comparisons
- IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake) vs Apple GPUA18 Pro GPU 5-core
- IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake) vs Radeon840M
- IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake) vs GeForce GTX470
- IntelGraphics (Wildcat Lake) vs GeForce GTX560
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Radeon HD6870
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Radeon R7360
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs GeForce GTX560 Ti
- Intel IrisXe Graphics vs Intel ArcA350M
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) / Intel Iris Xe Graphics.
No comments yet — be the first.