EN

Arc A350M vs Radeon 840M

VS

Performance score

Arc A350M · 4 GB GDDR6, 25–35 W
3.52 +8%
Radeon 840M · shared with RAM
3.27

By our estimate, Arc A350M beats Radeon 840M by 8%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc A350M
393+233 %

faster than 11% of tested · runs: 1

faster than 10% of tested · runs: 6

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Arc A350MRadeon 840M
Score (0–100) 3.52 3.27
Ranking position 246 251
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Type Laptop Integrated
Architecture Xe (Alchemist) RDNA 3.5

Specifications

Arc A350MRadeon 840M
Shader cores 768 256
Boost clock 1150 MHz 2900 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 1.77 1.48
Hardware ray tracing yes yes

Video memory

Arc A350MRadeon 840M
VRAM 4 GB shared with RAM
Memory type GDDR6 DDR5 / LPDDR5X
Memory bus 64 bit no data

Power and connection

Arc A350MRadeon 840M
Board power 25–35 W no data

Pros and cons

Arc A350M

  • 8% higher overall score

Radeon 840M

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Arc A350M:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon 840M:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A350M / Radeon 840M.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.