FPSVersusAdreno X2-90 vs Radeon R7 260X
Performance score
Radeon 780M
Radeon RX 580
Radeon 8060S
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 5060
Radeon RX 9070 XT
GeForce RTX 4090
Adreno X2-90 is 16% faster than Radeon R7 260X by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Adreno X2-90 | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 4.63 | 3.99 |
| Ranking position | 227 | 237 |
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm | AMD |
| Type | Integrated | Desktop |
| Architecture | Adreno | GCN |
Specifications
| Adreno X2-90 | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 1536 | 896 |
| Boost clock | 1850 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 5.68 | 1.79 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Adreno X2-90 | Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 104 GB/s |
Pros and cons
Adreno X2-90
- 16% higher overall score
- has hardware ray tracing
Radeon R7 260X
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Adreno X2-90 / Radeon R7 260X.
No comments yet — be the first.