FPSVersusAdreno X1-45 vs Intel UHD Graphics (N-series)
Performance score
By our estimate, Adreno X1-45 beats Intel UHD Graphics (N-series) by 134%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Overview
| Adreno X1-45 | Intel UHD Graphics (N-series) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 1.87 | 0.8 |
| Ranking position | 269 | 273 |
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm | Intel |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Adreno | Xe-LP |
Specifications
| Adreno X1-45 | Intel UHD Graphics (N-series) | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 768 | 192 |
| Boost clock | 1100 MHz | 750 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 1.69 | 0.29 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Adreno X1-45 | Intel UHD Graphics (N-series) | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | DDR4 / DDR5 / LPDDR5 |
Pros and cons
Adreno X1-45
- 134% higher overall score
- has hardware ray tracing
Intel UHD Graphics (N-series)
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
- Qualcomm AdrenoX1-45 vs RadeonVega 8
- Qualcomm AdrenoX1-45 vs Radeon820M
- Qualcomm AdrenoX1-45 vs GeForce GTX650
- Qualcomm AdrenoX1-45 vs Radeon R7250
- Intel UHDGraphics (N-series) vs Intel UHDGraphics 600
- Intel UHDGraphics (N-series) vs Radeon610M
- Intel UHDGraphics (N-series) vs Radeon R7240
- Intel UHDGraphics (N-series) vs RadeonVega 8
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Adreno X1-45 / Intel UHD Graphics (N-series).
No comments yet — be the first.