FPSVersusCore Ultra 5 338H vs Ryzen 7 260
Performance score
Core Ultra 5 338H and Ryzen 7 260 are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core Ultra 5 338H | Ryzen 7 260 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 41.35 | 41.53 |
| Ranking position | 136 | 130 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Panther Lake | Zen 4 (Hawk Point) |
| Release date | Q1 2026 | Q2 2025 |
Specifications
| Core Ultra 5 338H | Ryzen 7 260 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 12 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| P + E cores | 4 + 8 | no data |
| Base clock | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 18 MB | 16 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Arc B370 GPU | AMD Radeon 780M Graphics |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Core Ultra 5 338H
- more cores: 12 vs 8
- bigger L3 cache: 18 MB vs 16 MB
- newer: released in 2026
Ryzen 7 260
- more threads: 16 vs 12
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 5 338H / Ryzen 7 260.
No comments yet — be the first.