FPSVersusApple A15 Bionic vs Google Tensor G3
Performance score
By our estimate, Apple A15 Bionic beats Google Tensor G3 by 23%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Apple A15 Bionic | Google Tensor G3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 22.56 | 18.35 |
| Ranking position | 22 | 30 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Apple | |
| Architecture | Apple Silicon (Arm) | Armv9-A |
| Release date | Q3 2021 | Q4 2023 |
Specifications
| Apple A15 Bionic | Google Tensor G3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 9 |
| Threads | 6 | 9 |
| Core layout | 2× Apple A15 3.23 GHz + 4× Apple E 2.02 GHz | 1× Cortex-X3 2.91 GHz + 4× Cortex-A715 2.37 GHz + 4× Cortex-A510 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.23 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| Process node | TSMC N5P | Samsung 4 нм |
| Graphics | Apple GPU (4–5 cores) | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 |
Memory
| Apple A15 Bionic | Google Tensor G3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Apple A15 Bionic
- 23% higher overall score
- 27% faster single core
Google Tensor G3
- more cores: 9 vs 6
- more threads: 9 vs 6
- newer: released in 2023
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple A15 Bionic / Google Tensor G3.
No comments yet — be the first.