EN

Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) vs Radeon 660M

VS

Performance score

Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) · shared with RAM
3.31 +14%
Radeon 660M · shared with RAM
2.90
Radeon 780M Radeon 8060S

By our estimate, Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) beats Radeon 660M by 14%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Radeon 660M
130

faster than 12% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)Radeon 660M
Score (0–100) 3.31 2.9
Ranking position 250 258
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Type Integrated Integrated
Architecture Xe3 RDNA 2

Specifications

Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)Radeon 660M
Shader cores 256 384
Boost clock 2200 MHz 1800–1900 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 1.13 1.46
Hardware ray tracing yes yes
Upscaling no data FSR

Video memory

Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)Radeon 660M
VRAM shared with RAM shared with RAM
Memory type DDR5 / LPDDR5X LPDDR5 / DDR5

Pros and cons

Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)

  • 14% higher overall score

Radeon 660M

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake):

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon 660M:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) / Radeon 660M.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.