FPSVersusArc A530M vs GeForce GTX 780
Performance score
By our estimate, GeForce GTX 780 beats Arc A530M by 4%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 6.47 | 6.76 |
| Ranking position | 196 | 192 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | no data | 12.96 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | Kepler |
Specifications
| Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 1536 | 2304 |
| Base clock | no data | 863 MHz |
| Boost clock | 1300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 3.99 | 4.15 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 288 GB/s |
Power and connection
| Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | 65–95 W | 250 W |
Pros and cons
Arc A530M
- more VRAM: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- has hardware ray tracing
GeForce GTX 780
- 4% higher overall score
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A530M / GeForce GTX 780.
No comments yet — be the first.