FPSVersusArc A350M vs GeForce GTX 660
Performance score
GeForce GTX 660 is 10% faster than Arc A350M by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 3.52 | 3.88 |
| Ranking position | 246 | 239 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | no data | 13.29 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | Kepler |
Specifications
| Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 768 | 960 |
| Base clock | no data | 980 MHz |
| Boost clock | 1150 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 1.77 | 1.98 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus | 64 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 144 GB/s |
Power and connection
| Arc A350M | GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | 25–35 W | 140 W |
Pros and cons
Arc A350M
- more VRAM: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- has hardware ray tracing
GeForce GTX 660
- 10% higher overall score
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A350M / GeForce GTX 660.
No comments yet — be the first.