EN

Apple M3 GPU 8-core vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics

VS

Performance score

Apple M3 GPU 8-core · shared with RAM
4.58 +28%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics · shared with RAM
3.58

By our estimate, Apple M3 GPU 8-core beats Intel Iris Xe Graphics by 28%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 45% of tested · runs: 7

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Apple M3 GPU 8-coreIntel Iris Xe Graphics
Score (0–100) 4.58 3.58
Ranking position 229 243
Manufacturer Apple Intel
Type Integrated Integrated
Architecture Apple Xe-LP

Specifications

Apple M3 GPU 8-coreIntel Iris Xe Graphics
Shader cores 1024 768
Boost clock 1380 MHz 1100–1450 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 2.83 2.15
Hardware ray tracing yes no

Video memory

Apple M3 GPU 8-coreIntel Iris Xe Graphics
VRAM shared with RAM shared with RAM
Memory type unified DDR4 / DDR5 / LPDDR5

Pros and cons

Apple M3 GPU 8-core

  • 28% higher overall score
  • has hardware ray tracing

Intel Iris Xe Graphics

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Apple M3 GPU 8-core:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Intel Iris Xe Graphics:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple M3 GPU 8-core / Intel Iris Xe Graphics.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.