Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core vs Arc 130V: graphics card comparison

Performance score

Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core · shared with RAM

7.78 +11%

Arc 130V · shared with RAM

7.00

Radeon 660M Radeon 8060S

By our estimate, Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core beats Arc 130V by 11%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core

782+36 %

faster than 40% of tested · runs: 23

Arc 130V

576

faster than 33% of tested · runs: 7

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

	Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core	Arc 130V
Score (0–100)	7.78	7
Ranking position	180	188
Manufacturer	Apple	Intel
Type	Integrated	Integrated
Architecture	Apple	Xe2 (Battlemage)

Specifications

	Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core	Arc 130V
Shader cores	2048	896
Boost clock	1398 MHz	1850 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated)	5.73	3.32
AI TOPS (as stated by the maker)	no data	53
Hardware ray tracing	no	yes
Upscaling	no data	XeSS

Video memory

	Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core	Arc 130V
VRAM	shared with RAM	shared with RAM
Memory type	unified	LPDDR5X

Pros and cons

Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core

11% higher overall score

Arc 130V

has hardware ray tracing

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core / Arc 130V.

No comments yet — be the first.