FPSVersusApple M2 Pro GPU 16-core vs Radeon 780M
Performance score
By our estimate, Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core beats Radeon 780M by 4%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core | Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 7.78 | 7.46 |
| Ranking position | 180 | 182 |
| Manufacturer | Apple | AMD |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Apple | RDNA 3 |
Specifications
| Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core | Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 2048 | 768 |
| Boost clock | 1398 MHz | 2500–2900 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 5.73 | 4.45 |
| Hardware ray tracing | no | yes |
| Upscaling | no data | FSR |
Video memory
| Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core | Radeon 780M | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | unified | LPDDR5X / DDR5 |
Pros and cons
Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core
- 4% higher overall score
Radeon 780M
- has hardware ray tracing
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple M2 Pro GPU 16-core / Radeon 780M.
No comments yet — be the first.