FPSVersusAdreno X2-90 vs Radeon 680M
Performance score
By our estimate, Radeon 680M beats Adreno X2-90 by 25%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
GPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Adreno X2-90 | Radeon 680M | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 4.63 | 5.81 |
| Ranking position | 227 | 204 |
| Manufacturer | Qualcomm | AMD |
| Type | Integrated | Integrated |
| Architecture | Adreno | RDNA 2 |
Specifications
| Adreno X2-90 | Radeon 680M | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 1536 | 768 |
| Boost clock | 1850 MHz | 2200–2400 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 5.68 | 3.69 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | yes |
| Upscaling | no data | FSR |
Video memory
| Adreno X2-90 | Radeon 680M | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 / DDR5 |
Pros and cons
Adreno X2-90
- no notable advantages
Radeon 680M
- 25% higher overall score
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Adreno X2-90 / Radeon 680M.
No comments yet — be the first.