FPSVersusExynos 2600 vs Google Tensor G5
Performance score
By our estimate, Exynos 2600 beats Google Tensor G5 by 32%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor G5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 34.81 | 26.39 |
| Ranking position | 8 | 16 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | |
| Architecture | Armv9.3-A | Armv9.2-A |
| Release date | Q1 2026 | Q3 2025 |
Specifications
| Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor G5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 8 |
| Threads | 10 | 8 |
| Core layout | 1× C1-Ultra 3.8 GHz + 3× C1-Pro 3.25 GHz + 6× C1-Pro 2.75 GHz | 1× Cortex-X4 3.78 GHz + 5× Cortex-A725 3.05 GHz + 2× Cortex-A520 2.25 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.78 GHz |
| Process node | Samsung 2 нм GAA | TSMC N3E |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 |
Memory
| Exynos 2600 | Google Tensor G5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Exynos 2600
- 32% higher overall score
- 21% faster single core
- more cores: 10 vs 8
- more threads: 10 vs 8
- newer: released in 2026
Google Tensor G5
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Exynos 2600 / Google Tensor G5.
No comments yet — be the first.