FPSVersusExynos 2200 vs Google Tensor G3
Performance score
By our estimate, Google Tensor G3 beats Exynos 2200 by 15%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Exynos 2200 | Google Tensor G3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 15.97 | 18.35 |
| Ranking position | 34 | 30 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | |
| Architecture | Armv9-A | Armv9-A |
| Release date | Q1 2022 | Q4 2023 |
Specifications
| Exynos 2200 | Google Tensor G3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 9 |
| Threads | 8 | 9 |
| Core layout | 1× Cortex-X2 2.8 GHz + 3× Cortex-A710 2.52 GHz + 4× Cortex-A510 1.82 GHz | 1× Cortex-X3 2.91 GHz + 4× Cortex-A715 2.37 GHz + 4× Cortex-A510 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| Process node | Samsung 4 нм | Samsung 4 нм |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 |
Memory
| Exynos 2200 | Google Tensor G3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Exynos 2200
- no notable advantages
Google Tensor G3
- 15% higher overall score
- 13% faster single core
- more cores: 9 vs 8
- more threads: 9 vs 8
- newer: released in 2023
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Exynos 2200 / Google Tensor G3.
No comments yet — be the first.