FPSVersusDimensity 9400 vs Exynos 2600
Performance score
Exynos 2600 is 11% faster than Dimensity 9400 by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Dimensity 9400 | Exynos 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 31.44 | 34.81 |
| Ranking position | 13 | 8 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Architecture | Armv9.2-A | Armv9.3-A |
| Release date | Q4 2024 | Q1 2026 |
Specifications
| Dimensity 9400 | Exynos 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10 |
| Threads | 8 | 10 |
| Core layout | 1× Cortex-X925 3.62 GHz + 3× Cortex-X4 3.3 GHz + 4× Cortex-A720 2.4 GHz | 1× C1-Ultra 3.8 GHz + 3× C1-Pro 3.25 GHz + 6× C1-Pro 2.75 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.62 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Process node | TSMC N3E | Samsung 2 нм GAA |
| Graphics | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
Memory
| Dimensity 9400 | Exynos 2600 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Dimensity 9400
- no notable advantages
Exynos 2600
- 11% higher overall score
- 9% faster single core
- more cores: 10 vs 8
- more threads: 10 vs 8
- newer: released in 2026
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Dimensity 9400 / Exynos 2600.
No comments yet — be the first.