EN

Core Ultra 7 251HX vs Core Ultra 7 265H

VS

Performance score

Core Ultra 7 251HX 2026 · 18/18 cores/threads
55.34 +3%
Core Ultra 7 265H 2025 · 16/16 cores/threads
53.69

Core Ultra 7 251HX is 3% faster than Core Ultra 7 265H by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

CPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 83% of tested · runs: 10

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Core Ultra 7 251HXCore Ultra 7 265H
Score (0–100) 55.34 53.69
Ranking position 47 52
Type Laptop Laptop
Manufacturer Intel Intel
Architecture Arrow Lake Arrow Lake
Release date Q2 2026 Q2 2025

Specifications

Core Ultra 7 251HXCore Ultra 7 265H
Cores 18 16
Threads 18 16
P + E cores 6 + 12 6 + 10
Boost clock 5.1 GHz 5.3 GHz
L3 cache 30 MB 24 MB
Unlocked multiplier no no
Integrated graphics no Intel Arc 140T GPU
NPU (AI accelerator) no no

Pros and cons

Core Ultra 7 251HX

  • 3% higher overall score
  • more cores: 18 vs 16
  • more threads: 18 vs 16
  • bigger L3 cache: 30 MB vs 24 MB
  • newer: released in 2026

Core Ultra 7 265H

  • 4% faster single core
  • has integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T GPU)

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core Ultra 7 251HX:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core Ultra 7 265H:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 7 251HX / Core Ultra 7 265H.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.