FPSVersusCeleron 7305 vs Core i3-3225
Performance score
Core i5-12450H
Core Ultra 7 258V
Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900K
Ryzen 9 9950X
Core i3-3225 is 77% faster than Celeron 7305 by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Overview
| Celeron 7305 | Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 5.75 | 10.15 |
| Ranking position | 530 | 518 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | no data | 9.64 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Alder Lake | Ivy Bridge |
| Release date | Q1 2022 | Q3 2012 |
Specifications
| Celeron 7305 | Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 5 | 2 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| P + E cores | 1 + 4 | no data |
| Base clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 3 MB |
| Process node | no data | 22 nm |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics (Xe) | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Compatibility
| Celeron 7305 | Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | no data | LGA1155 |
| TDP | no data | 55 W |
Memory and PCI Express
| Celeron 7305 | Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | no data | DDR3-1333/1600 |
| Memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Max memory | no data | 32 GB |
| PCI Express version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros and cons
Celeron 7305
- more cores: 5 vs 2
- more threads: 6 vs 4
- bigger L3 cache: 8 MB vs 3 MB
- newer: released in 2022
Core i3-3225
- 77% higher overall score
- 82% faster single core
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Celeron 7305 / Core i3-3225.
No comments yet — be the first.