FPSVersusCeleron 7305 vs Celeron N4500
Performance score
Celeron N4500 is 5% faster than Celeron 7305 by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
CPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Celeron 7305 | Celeron N4500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 5.75 | 6.01 |
| Ranking position | 530 | 529 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Alder Lake | Tremont (Jasper Lake) |
| Release date | Q1 2022 | Q1 2022 |
Specifications
| Celeron 7305 | Celeron N4500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 5 | 2 |
| Threads | 6 | 2 |
| P + E cores | 1 + 4 | no data |
| Base clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock | 1.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics (Xe) | Intel UHD Graphics |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Celeron 7305
- more cores: 5 vs 2
- more threads: 6 vs 2
- bigger L3 cache: 8 MB vs 4 MB
Celeron N4500
- 5% higher overall score
- 31% faster single core
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Celeron 7305 / Celeron N4500.
No comments yet — be the first.