FPSVersusApple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G4
Performance score
By our estimate, Apple A16 Bionic beats Google Tensor G4 by 22%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 24.95 | 20.41 |
| Ranking position | 18 | 25 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Apple | |
| Architecture | Apple Silicon (Arm) | Armv9.2-A |
| Release date | Q3 2022 | Q3 2024 |
Specifications
| Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Core layout | 2× Apple A16 3.46 GHz + 4× Apple E 2.02 GHz | 1× Cortex-X4 3.1 GHz + 3× Cortex-A720 2.6 GHz + 4× Cortex-A520 1.92 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.46 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Process node | TSMC N4 | Samsung 4 нм |
| Graphics | Apple GPU (5 cores) | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 |
Memory
| Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Apple A16 Bionic
- 22% higher overall score
- 22% faster single core
Google Tensor G4
- more cores: 8 vs 6
- more threads: 8 vs 6
- newer: released in 2024
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple A16 Bionic / Google Tensor G4.
No comments yet — be the first.