FPSVersusApple A16 Bionic vs Dimensity 9300
Performance score
Apple A16 Bionic and Dimensity 9300 are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Apple A16 Bionic | Dimensity 9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 24.95 | 25 |
| Ranking position | 18 | 17 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Apple | MediaTek |
| Architecture | Apple Silicon (Arm) | Armv9.2-A |
| Release date | Q3 2022 | Q4 2023 |
Specifications
| Apple A16 Bionic | Dimensity 9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Core layout | 2× Apple A16 3.46 GHz + 4× Apple E 2.02 GHz | 1× Cortex-X4 3.25 GHz + 3× Cortex-X4 2.85 GHz + 4× Cortex-A720 2 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.46 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| Process node | TSMC N4 | TSMC 4 нм |
| Graphics | Apple GPU (5 cores) | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
Memory
| Apple A16 Bionic | Dimensity 9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5T |
Pros and cons
Apple A16 Bionic
- 17% faster single core
Dimensity 9300
- more cores: 8 vs 6
- more threads: 8 vs 6
- newer: released in 2023
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple A16 Bionic / Dimensity 9300.
No comments yet — be the first.