FPSVersusCMF Phone 1 vs Samsung Galaxy A35
Performance score
CMF Phone 1 is 4% faster than Samsung Galaxy A35 by our estimate.
A smartphone's score is the score of its chip — our calculation from specs, not a benchmark. See screen, battery and cameras in the tables below.
Overview
| CMF Phone 1 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance (0–100) | 10.86 | 10.46 |
| Chip | Dimensity 7300 | Exynos 1380 |
| Brand | Nothing | Samsung |
| Release date | Q3 2024 | Q1 2024 |
| Launch price | no data | $399 |
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
Display
| CMF Phone 1 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67″ | 6.6″ |
| Resolution | 2400×1080 | 2340×1080 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Display type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Memory
| CMF Phone 1 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 6 / 8 GB | 6 / 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB / 256 GB | 128 GB / 256 GB |
Battery, cameras, body
| CMF Phone 1 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear cameras | no data | 3 |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Weight | 197 g | 209 g |
Pros and cons
CMF Phone 1
- chip is 4% faster
- faster charging: 33 vs 25 W
- lighter: 197 vs 209 g
Samsung Galaxy A35
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: CMF Phone 1 / Samsung Galaxy A35.
No comments yet — be the first.