FPSVersusRadeon 840M vs Radeon R7 250X
Performance score
By our estimate, Radeon 840M beats Radeon R7 250X by 5%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
GPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Radeon 840M | Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 3.27 | 3.1 |
| Ranking position | 251 | 255 |
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Type | Integrated | Desktop |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN |
Specifications
| Radeon 840M | Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 256 | 640 |
| Boost clock | 2900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 1.48 | 1.28 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Radeon 840M | Radeon R7 250X | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory type | DDR5 / LPDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 96 GB/s |
Pros and cons
Radeon 840M
- 5% higher overall score
- has hardware ray tracing
Radeon R7 250X
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Radeon 840M / Radeon R7 250X.
No comments yet — be the first.