FPSVersusGeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon 760M
Performance score
GeForce GTX 950 and Radeon 760M are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 5.48 | 5.37 |
| Ranking position | 213 | 219 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | 29.19 | no data |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Type | Desktop | Integrated |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 3 |
Specifications
| GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 768 | 512 |
| Base clock | 1024 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock | 1188 MHz | 2400–2800 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 1.82 | 2.87 |
| Hardware ray tracing | no | yes |
| Upscaling | no data | FSR |
Video memory
| GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 2 GB | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR5X / DDR5 |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 105 GB/s | no data |
Power and connection
| GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | 90 W | no data |
Pros and cons
GeForce GTX 950
- no notable advantages
Radeon 760M
- has hardware ray tracing
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: GeForce GTX 950 / Radeon 760M.
No comments yet — be the first.