FPSVersusArc Pro A30M vs Radeon 760M
Performance score
Arc Pro A30M and Radeon 760M are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
GPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Arc Pro A30M | Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 5.32 | 5.37 |
| Ranking position | 220 | 219 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Type | Laptop | Integrated |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | RDNA 3 |
Specifications
| Arc Pro A30M | Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 1024 | 512 |
| Boost clock | 1500 MHz | 2400–2800 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 3.07 | 2.87 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | yes |
| Upscaling | no data | FSR |
Video memory
| Arc Pro A30M | Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 GB | shared with RAM |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5X / DDR5 |
| Memory bus | 64 bit | no data |
Power and connection
| Arc Pro A30M | Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | 35–50 W | no data |
Pros and cons
Arc Pro A30M
- no notable advantages
Radeon 760M
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc Pro A30M / Radeon 760M.
No comments yet — be the first.