EN

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake) vs Radeon 680M

VS

Performance score

6.62 +14%
Radeon 680M · shared with RAM
5.81

By our estimate, Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake) beats Radeon 680M by 14%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 21% of tested · runs: 4

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)Radeon 680M
Score (0–100) 6.62 5.81
Ranking position 194 204
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Type Integrated Integrated
Architecture Xe (Alchemist) RDNA 2

Specifications

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)Radeon 680M
Shader cores 1024 768
Boost clock 2200–2350 MHz 2200–2400 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 4.81 3.69
AI TOPS (as stated by the maker) 19 no data
Hardware ray tracing yes yes
Upscaling XeSS FSR

Video memory

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)Radeon 680M
VRAM shared with RAM shared with RAM
Memory type LPDDR5X / DDR5 LPDDR5 / DDR5

Pros and cons

Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake)

  • 14% higher overall score

Radeon 680M

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake):

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon 680M:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Intel Arc Graphics (Meteor Lake) / Radeon 680M.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.