EN

Arc A530M vs Radeon RX 6500M

VS

Performance score

Arc A530M · 4 GB GDDR6, 65–95 W
6.47
Radeon RX 6500M 2022 · 4 GB GDDR6, ≤ 50 W
10.10 +56%

By our estimate, Radeon RX 6500M beats Arc A530M by 56%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc A530M
1013+164 %

faster than 31% of tested · runs: 1

faster than 9% of tested · runs: 5

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Arc A530MRadeon RX 6500M
Score (0–100) 6.47 10.1
Ranking position 196 154
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Type Laptop Laptop
Architecture Xe (Alchemist) RDNA 2
Release date no data 2022-01-04

Specifications

Arc A530MRadeon RX 6500M
Shader cores 1536 1024
Game clock no data 2191 MHz
Boost clock 1300 MHz 2191 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 3.99 4.49
Hardware ray tracing yes yes
Upscaling no data FSR

Video memory

Arc A530MRadeon RX 6500M
VRAM 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 64 bit
Memory bandwidth no data 128 GB/s
Infinity Cache no data 16 MB

Power and connection

Arc A530MRadeon RX 6500M
Board power 65–95 W ≤ 50 W

Pros and cons

Arc A530M

  • no notable advantages

Radeon RX 6500M

  • 56% higher overall score

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Arc A530M:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon RX 6500M:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A530M / Radeon RX 6500M.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.