FPSVersusArc A530M vs GeForce GTX 1630
Performance score
Arc A530M is 4% faster than GeForce GTX 1630 by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1630 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 6.47 | 6.25 |
| Ranking position | 196 | 199 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | no data | 39.95 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | Turing |
| Release date | no data | 2022-06-28 |
Specifications
| Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1630 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 1536 | 512 |
| Base clock | no data | 1740 MHz |
| Boost clock | 1300 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 3.99 | 1.83 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
Video memory
| Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1630 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 64 bit |
Power and connection
| Arc A530M | GeForce GTX 1630 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | 65–95 W | 75 W |
| PCI Express version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros and cons
Arc A530M
- 4% higher overall score
- has hardware ray tracing
GeForce GTX 1630
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A530M / GeForce GTX 1630.
No comments yet — be the first.