EN

Arc A370M vs GeForce MX350

VS

Performance score

Arc A370M · 4 GB GDDR6, 35–50 W
5.45 +9%
GeForce MX350 · 2 GB GDDR5, 20 W
4.98

By our estimate, Arc A370M beats GeForce MX350 by 9%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc A370M
436+369 %

faster than 16% of tested · runs: 2

faster than 0% of tested · runs: 6

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Arc A370MGeForce MX350
Score (0–100) 5.45 4.98
Ranking position 215 223
Manufacturer Intel NVIDIA
Type Laptop Laptop
Architecture Xe (Alchemist) Pascal

Specifications

Arc A370MGeForce MX350
Shader cores 1024 640
Boost clock 1550 MHz 1468 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 3.17 1.88
Hardware ray tracing yes no

Video memory

Arc A370MGeForce MX350
VRAM 4 GB 2 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bus 64 bit 64 bit

Power and connection

Arc A370MGeForce MX350
Board power 35–50 W 20 W

Pros and cons

Arc A370M

  • 9% higher overall score
  • more VRAM: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • has hardware ray tracing

GeForce MX350

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Arc A370M:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 GeForce MX350:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A370M / GeForce MX350.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.