Arc A350M vs Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake): graphics card comparison

Performance score

Arc A350M · 4 GB GDDR6, 25–35 W

3.52 +6%

Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) · shared with RAM

3.31

Radeon 780M GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

Arc A350M is 6% faster than Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake) by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc A350M

393

faster than 11% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

	Arc A350M	Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)
Score (0–100)	3.52	3.31
Ranking position	246	250
Manufacturer	Intel	Intel
Type	Laptop	Integrated
Architecture	Xe (Alchemist)	Xe3

Specifications

	Arc A350M	Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)
Shader cores	768	256
Boost clock	1150 MHz	2200 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated)	1.77	1.13
Hardware ray tracing	yes	yes

Video memory

	Arc A350M	Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)
VRAM	4 GB	shared with RAM
Memory type	GDDR6	DDR5 / LPDDR5X
Memory bus	64 bit	no data

Power and connection

	Arc A350M	Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)
Board power	25–35 W	no data

Pros and cons

Arc A350M

6% higher overall score

Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake)

no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A350M / Intel Graphics (Wildcat Lake).

No comments yet — be the first.