FPSVersusArc A310 vs Arc A530M
Performance score
By our estimate, Arc A530M beats Arc A310 by 9%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Arc A310 | Arc A530M | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 5.91 | 6.47 |
| Ranking position | 203 | 196 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | 37.78 | no data |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Architecture | Xe (Alchemist) | Xe (Alchemist) |
| Release date | Q3 2022 | no data |
Specifications
| Arc A310 | Arc A530M | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 768 | 1536 |
| Boost clock | 2000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 3.07 | 3.99 |
| AI TOPS (as stated by the maker) | 52 | no data |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | yes |
| Upscaling | XeSS | no data |
Video memory
| Arc A310 | Arc A530M | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory bandwidth | 124 GB/s | no data |
Power and connection
| Arc A310 | Arc A530M | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | 75 W | 65–95 W |
| PCI Express version | 4.0 | no data |
Pros and cons
Arc A310
- no notable advantages
Arc A530M
- 9% higher overall score
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc A310 / Arc A530M.
No comments yet — be the first.