Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core vs Arc 140V: graphics card comparison

Performance score

Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core · shared with RAM

8.51 +6%

Arc 140V · shared with RAM

8.03

Radeon 660M Radeon 8060S

Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core is 6% faster than Arc 140V by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core

2373+280 %

faster than 79% of tested · runs: 72

Arc 140V

624

faster than 36% of tested · runs: 22

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

	Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core	Arc 140V
Score (0–100)	8.51	8.03
Ranking position	174	178
Manufacturer	Apple	Intel
Type	Integrated	Integrated
Architecture	Apple	Xe2 (Battlemage)

Specifications

	Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core	Arc 140V
Shader cores	2048	1024
Boost clock	1578 MHz	1950 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated)	6.46	3.99
AI TOPS (as stated by the maker)	no data	64
Hardware ray tracing	yes	yes
Upscaling	no data	XeSS

Video memory

	Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core	Arc 140V
VRAM	shared with RAM	shared with RAM
Memory type	unified	LPDDR5X

Pros and cons

Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core

6% higher overall score

Arc 140V

no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple M4 Pro GPU 16-core / Arc 140V.

No comments yet — be the first.