EN

Apple M4 GPU 10-core vs Arc 140T

VS

Performance score

Apple M4 GPU 10-core · shared with RAM
5.98
Arc 140T · shared with RAM
6.62 +11%

By our estimate, Arc 140T beats Apple M4 GPU 10-core by 11%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 55% of tested · runs: 176

Arc 140T
804

faster than 43% of tested · runs: 15

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Apple M4 GPU 10-coreArc 140T
Score (0–100) 5.98 6.62
Ranking position 202 193
Manufacturer Apple Intel
Type Integrated Integrated
Architecture Apple Xe (Alchemist)

Specifications

Apple M4 GPU 10-coreArc 140T
Shader cores 1280 1024
Boost clock 1578 MHz 2250–2350 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 4.04 4.81
AI TOPS (as stated by the maker) no data 77
Hardware ray tracing yes yes
Upscaling no data XeSS

Video memory

Apple M4 GPU 10-coreArc 140T
VRAM shared with RAM shared with RAM
Memory type unified LPDDR5X / DDR5

Pros and cons

Apple M4 GPU 10-core

  • no notable advantages

Arc 140T

  • 11% higher overall score

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Apple M4 GPU 10-core:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Arc 140T:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple M4 GPU 10-core / Arc 140T.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.