Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core vs Arc A350M: graphics card comparison

Performance score

Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core · shared with RAM

3.34

Arc A350M · 4 GB GDDR6, 25–35 W

3.52 +5%

Radeon 780M GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop

Arc A350M is 5% faster than Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc A350M

393

faster than 11% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

	Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core	Arc A350M
Score (0–100)	3.34	3.52
Ranking position	249	246
Manufacturer	Apple	Intel
Type	Integrated	Laptop
Architecture	Apple	Xe (Alchemist)

Specifications

	Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core	Arc A350M
Shader cores	640	768
Boost clock	1450 MHz	1150 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated)	1.86	1.77
Hardware ray tracing	yes	yes

Video memory

	Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core	Arc A350M
VRAM	shared with RAM	4 GB
Memory type	unified	GDDR6
Memory bus	no data	64 bit

Power and connection

	Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core	Arc A350M
Board power	no data	25–35 W

Pros and cons

Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core

no notable advantages

Arc A350M

5% higher overall score

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple A18 Pro GPU 5-core / Arc A350M.

No comments yet — be the first.