FPSVersusCore i9-13950HX vs Ryzen AI Max+ 392
Performance score
By our estimate, Core i9-13950HX beats Ryzen AI Max+ 392 by 4%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core i9-13950HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 392 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 60.83 | 58.3 |
| Ranking position | 35 | 44 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 5 (Strix Halo) |
| Release date | Q2 2023 | Q2 2026 |
Specifications
| Core i9-13950HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 392 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 12 |
| Threads | 32 | 24 |
| P + E cores | 8 + 16 | no data |
| Base clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 36 MB | 64 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Core i9-13950HX
- 4% higher overall score
- more cores: 24 vs 12
- more threads: 32 vs 24
Ryzen AI Max+ 392
- 6% faster single core
- bigger L3 cache: 64 MB vs 36 MB
- newer: released in 2026
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core i9-13950HX / Ryzen AI Max+ 392.
No comments yet — be the first.